Post by Meltd0wn on Sept 15, 2008 14:51:23 GMT
EA has defended its use of SecuROM DRM in Spore, saying that it "has not changed" its basic copy protection policy, following a backlash by internet users on Amazon.
Earlier this month, consumers expressed their anger at the limitations imposed on them by the mandatory installation of SecuRom, which allows EA to limit the installation of each copy of Spore to a maximum number of three times. Mariam Sughayer of EA's corporate communications, told Gamasutra that the current DRM system is merely an extension of what they've always done.
"EA has not changed our basic DRM copy protection system... We simply changed the copy protection method from using the physical media, which requires authentication every time you play the game by requiring a disc in the drive, to one which uses a one-time online authentication," she said.
Three installations is more than enough for EA's customers who mostly only ever install their games once, according to the publisher's research, while combating piracy. Sughayer claimed that during the activations of the Spore Creature Creator, 77 per cent only ever activated it on one machine and 23 per cent activated it on more than one, of which only 1 per cent attempted to activate it on more than three computers.
Frustration at EA's anti-piracy policy risked further inflammation upon the confirmation that each copy of the game can only have a single account attached to it, meaning only one person can play the game at any given time.
"There is one Spore registration/account per game/serial code so... you cannot make multiple accounts at this time," commented an EA representative on Spore's forum. "I have sent your guys' feedback to the game team though since I can understand the desire to share a game on a system that you entire family uses."
This follows news that in the period between September 1-11, Spore had been illegally downloaded 171,402 times, according to Big Champagne, a peer-to-peer research firm, and reported by Forbes.
"The numbers are extraordinary," said Big Champagne's chief executive, Eric Garland. "This is a very high level of torrent activity even for an immensely popular game title."
----------------------
Notice that the sole purpose behind the DRM was to stop piracy. and yet it has been stated that over 170,000 copies of the game have already been pirated and that was befor the game even launched. So basically the ONLY thing the DRM is doing is pissing off the legitimate customers, since the Pirated copies of the game obviuosly dont have the DRM included.
Yet again a major company chooses to anger customers in the name of "policy" instead of just doing what is right.
I know from personal experince that I enjoy games for years. I have installed and uninstalled several differnt PC games probably more than 10 times over the past several years. not because I'm a pirate, but because I am a fan and love to play old games I havent played in a few months or even a couple of years time.
Now not only am I limited to how many times I can actually put the game on my computer, but none of the rest of my family can play the game unless I buy a seperate game for each family member. NOPE, not even going to buy one for myself anymore. the once most anticipate game for me is now the yet another major dissapointment with video game companies turning on their customers.
(Source: GamesIndustry.biz)
Earlier this month, consumers expressed their anger at the limitations imposed on them by the mandatory installation of SecuRom, which allows EA to limit the installation of each copy of Spore to a maximum number of three times. Mariam Sughayer of EA's corporate communications, told Gamasutra that the current DRM system is merely an extension of what they've always done.
"EA has not changed our basic DRM copy protection system... We simply changed the copy protection method from using the physical media, which requires authentication every time you play the game by requiring a disc in the drive, to one which uses a one-time online authentication," she said.
Three installations is more than enough for EA's customers who mostly only ever install their games once, according to the publisher's research, while combating piracy. Sughayer claimed that during the activations of the Spore Creature Creator, 77 per cent only ever activated it on one machine and 23 per cent activated it on more than one, of which only 1 per cent attempted to activate it on more than three computers.
Frustration at EA's anti-piracy policy risked further inflammation upon the confirmation that each copy of the game can only have a single account attached to it, meaning only one person can play the game at any given time.
"There is one Spore registration/account per game/serial code so... you cannot make multiple accounts at this time," commented an EA representative on Spore's forum. "I have sent your guys' feedback to the game team though since I can understand the desire to share a game on a system that you entire family uses."
This follows news that in the period between September 1-11, Spore had been illegally downloaded 171,402 times, according to Big Champagne, a peer-to-peer research firm, and reported by Forbes.
"The numbers are extraordinary," said Big Champagne's chief executive, Eric Garland. "This is a very high level of torrent activity even for an immensely popular game title."
----------------------
Notice that the sole purpose behind the DRM was to stop piracy. and yet it has been stated that over 170,000 copies of the game have already been pirated and that was befor the game even launched. So basically the ONLY thing the DRM is doing is pissing off the legitimate customers, since the Pirated copies of the game obviuosly dont have the DRM included.
Yet again a major company chooses to anger customers in the name of "policy" instead of just doing what is right.
I know from personal experince that I enjoy games for years. I have installed and uninstalled several differnt PC games probably more than 10 times over the past several years. not because I'm a pirate, but because I am a fan and love to play old games I havent played in a few months or even a couple of years time.
Now not only am I limited to how many times I can actually put the game on my computer, but none of the rest of my family can play the game unless I buy a seperate game for each family member. NOPE, not even going to buy one for myself anymore. the once most anticipate game for me is now the yet another major dissapointment with video game companies turning on their customers.
(Source: GamesIndustry.biz)
